The (#2) University of Michigan men’s basketball team played two games this past week, and they won both of them.  On Wednesday (02/11/2026), they won at Northwestern 87-75, then on Saturday (02/14/2026), they beat UCLA 86-56 in Crisler Arena.  Michigan’s record improves to 24-1 (14-1 in Big Ten).  Michigan is still all alone in 1^st place in the Big Ten.

What Happened?

Michigan had a few scary moments this week.  They were behind for much of the Northwestern game, and they gave up most of the lead they had built up against UCLA in the first 18 minutes during a scary last 2 minutes of the half.  Fortunately, Michigan kept their composure and finished strong in both games, winning by 12 and 30 points.

The Northwestern game was ugly, until it wasn’t.  Northwestern led for most of the game, and Michigan seemed powerless to catch them.  When the Michigan defense managed to stop Northwestern, the Michigan offense squandered the opportunity to score and cut into the deficit.  When the Michigan offense stopped shooting themselves in the foot, the Michigan defense would let Northwestern score easily to neutralize the offensive output.  It was very frustrating.  Once Michigan stopped throwing away their opportunities, they did fine, but it took 26 minutes for the tide to turn.

The UCLA game was much less uncomfortable.  Michigan never trailed, and except for a miserable 2-minute period just before halftime, they were in control of the game.  They were very sharp in the 2^nd half, and blew the game wide open.

Game Flow

Michigan actually led Northwestern early, up 3-0 and 5-0.  Northwestern promptly went on an 8-0 run to take the lead (8-5) at the 17:37 mark.  Michigan fought back, and went ahead for the last time in a long while, 10-8, with 16:24 left.  Northwestern went ahead, but Michigan managed to tie it up (17-17) at the 14:22 mark.  This is one of the turning points in the game: Michigan had 4 stops in a row, along with 3 offensive rebounds, but they wasted all 4 of these opportunities with 2 turnovers, 2 missed 2-point shots, and 3 missed 3-point shots.  Finally, with 12:28 left, Northwestern scored again (a 3-pointer), and the floodgates opened.  In the next 2 minutes, Northwestern shot 2/3 from 2-point range, 2/3 from 3-point range, and 2/2 from the free throw line.  At the same time, Michigan missed one 2-point shot, two 3-point shots, and committed a turnover.  The end result was a 12-0 run for Northwestern in a little over 2 minutes, and the game was suddenly out of hand at the 10:05 mark.  Northwestern kept the lead in the 9-11 point range for the rest of the half, up 9 points (44-35) at halftime.

Michigan has only been behind at halftime a handful of times this season, and this was the biggest deficit so far.  Michigan usually wins the first 4 minutes of the 2^nd half, but not in this game.  By the 1^st media timeout, at the 15:51 mark, Northwestern had increased their lead to 13 points, 54-41.  Things were looking grim.  Coming out of the timeout, Northwestern pushed their lead to a new high: 16 points (58-42) at the 14:22 mark.  That’s where the game finally turned around.  Michigan combined some stops with some offense, and started chipping away at the deficit.  By the 12:49 mark, they had it down to 11 points (58-47), then they went on an 11-2 run to get within 2 points (60-58) with 9:38 left.  Northwestern pushed their lead back up to 7 points (67-60) at the 8:42 mark, but Michigan went on an 8-0 run to go ahead for the first time in a long time, 68-67, with 7:14 to go.  Northwestern led one more time, 69-68, at the 6:39 mark, and then the game was tied up (69-69) at the 6:34 mark.  The rest of the way was all Michigan.  They went on a 6-0 run to go up 75-69, then another 8-2 run to push their lead up to 12 points (83-71) with 2:01 left.  Northwestern got within 8 points (83-75) at the 1:02 mark, but Michigan scored the last 4 points to win by 12.  It was a gutty, gritty, ugly win.

As I mentioned above, Michigan never trailed in the UCLA game.  They were up 5-0 at the 17:54 mark, then 10-3 with 15:31 left.  They kept the lead in the 7-9 point range for a while, and finally got it up to 10 (22-12) at the 11:14 mark.  UCLA hung around, and Michigan just kept the lead in the 7-9 point range for most of the rest of the half, until the ugly last 2 minutes.  With 2:39 left, Michigan had their biggest lead of the game, 39-28, and then things got out of hand for a few minutes.  UCLA hit a 3-pointer, Michigan made 1 of 2 free throws, and the score was 40-31 at the 2:04 mark.  UCLA made a 2-pointer, Michigan threw the ball away, then fouled.  UCLA made 1 of 2 free throws, Michigan missed a 3-pointer, and UCLA made another 2-pointer with 27 seconds left.  Michigan played for the last shot, but threw the ball away (again), and UCLA made another 2-pointer at the buzzer.  Michigan’s nice 11-point lead was down to 2 points at halftime, 40-38.

At the start of the 2^nd half, it took Michigan 6 minutes to finally get their lead back up to 10 points (54-44) again.  It took them another 6 minutes to push the lead up over 20 points (68-47) at the 8:17 mark, and that was the game.  They held off UCLA the rest of the way, pushing the lead to 30 points in the last 20 seconds.  Look at the halftime score (40-38), then look at the final score (86-56).  Michigan held UCLA to 18 points in the 2^nd half, while scoring 46.  Total domination, at least for a half.

Stats

The stats for the Northwestern game were mediocre.  Michigan shot poorly overall (30/69 = 43.5%), they shot 3-pointers poorly (8/29 = 27.6%), and they shot free throws decently (19/27 = 70.4%).  They won the rebounding battle handily (47-30), but they lost the turnover battle (12-8).  They won this game with rebounding, but almost lost it with poor shooting and turnovers.

The stats for the UCLA game were pretty good.  Michigan shot very well overall (31/50 = 62.0%), they shot 3-pointers well (7/19 = 36.8%), and they shot free throws decently (17/26 = 65.4%).  They were behind in rebounds almost the entire game, but they managed to eke out a narrow win in the rebounding battle (30-29), and they won the turnover battle (9-13).  They won this game with good shooting and great (2^nd half) defense.

Who Started?

The starters for both games were Nimari Burnett, Elliot Cadeau, Morez Johnson Jr., Yaxel Lendeborg, and Aday Mara.

Who Looked Good?

L.J. Cason had a great week.  He was the leading scorer for Michigan in the Northwestern game, with 18 points, and he followed it up with a solid game against UCLA, scoring 13 points.  He provided the spark that brought Michigan back in the Northwestern game.

Lendeborg had a solid week, with 15 and 17 points.  He also had 12 and 8 rebounds, giving him a double-double in the Northwestern game.

Johnson had a good week, with 12 and 15 points. 

Cadeau also had a good week, scoring 9 points in each game.  He also had 7 and 5 assists.

Mara had a decent week, with 12 and 9 points.  You could tell that he was trying so hard (maybe too hard) in the UCLA game, playing against his former team.  He managed to score a decent number of points, and he had 8 rebounds and 3 blocked shots.

Burnett had a decent week, with 6 and 12 points.

Trey McKenney chipped in 12 and 2 points off the bench.  His 2-point performance vs. UCLA ended a streak of 7 games in a row where he had scored in double figures.

Who Looked Not-So-Good?

Roddy Gayle Jr. had a quiet week, scoring 3 and 5 points off the bench.

Will Tschetter also had a quiet week, scoring 0 and 4 points off the bench.

Who Else Played?

Oscar Goodman played in the last 3 minutes of the UCLA game, but didn’t attempt a shot.

Who Didn’t Play?

The only scholarship player who didn’t play was Malick Kordel.  Winters Grady is out with an injury.

None of the Scout Team players (Howard Eisley Jr., Harrison Hochberg and Charlie May) got to play this week.

What Does It Mean?

These were very important wins for several reasons:

• They keep Michigan all alone in 1^st place in the Big Ten, now with a 2-game lead on Illinois, Purdue, and Nebraska.
• They keep Michigan in line for a #1 seed in the NCAA Tournament.
• They will probably help boost Michigan up to the #1 spot in this week’s AP Poll.  The current #1 team (Arizona) lost this past week, twice in fact.  Being ranked #1 doesn’t really mean much, but it’s a great recruiting and publicity tool.

This Week

This week, Michigan plays 2 very challenging games.  On Tuesday (02/17/2026, 6:30 p.m., Peacock), they play at (#13) Purdue, then on Saturday (02/21/2026, 6:30 p.m., ESPN), they play (#4) Duke in Capital One Arena in Washington (DC) in a game billed as “Duel In The District”.  It’s also billed as “The Edward Jones Capital Showcase Presented By Bad Boy Mowers”.  That’s a lot of names and sponsors.

Purdue is currently 21-4 (11-3 in Big Ten), with impressive wins over (#8) Alabama, (#15) Texas Tech, (#21) Auburn, Wisconsin, and (#7) Nebraska, and unimpressive losses to (#10) Iowa State (by 23 points at home), UCLA, and Indiana.  They have several noteworthy players (Fletcher Loyer, Braden Smith, and Trey Kaufman-Renn), and plenty of height: two 6’11” players and a 7’4” player.  Yes, another player taller than Mara.  Smith has been a terror against Michigan for his whole career, especially in West Lafayette.  This will be a very challenging game for Michigan, but they can win it if they play their “A” game.

Duke is currently 23-2 (12-1 in ACC), with impressive wins over Texas, (#24) Kansas, (#22) Arkansas, (#15) Florida, (#7) Michigan State, (#20) Louisville (twice), (#24) SMU, and (#20) Clemson.  They have no unimpressive losses.  They certainly do have a noteworthy player: Cameron Boozer, the megastar freshman who will probably be one of the top 3 NBA Draft picks this spring.  They don’t have a lot of height, only two 6’11” players.  This will be the most challenging game Michigan has played all season.  The result won’t affect the Big Ten race, but it will have major implications on the AP Poll and NCAA Tournament seedings.  Michigan can win this game, but it will take their best effort of the season.  They can’t afford to make many mistakes.

Check back next week to find out what happened and why.

Go Blue!

The (#2) University of Michigan men’s basketball team played two games this past week, and they won both of them.  On Thursday (02/05/2026), they beat Penn State 110-69 in Crisler Arena, then on Sunday (02/08/2026), they won at Ohio State 82-61.  Michigan’s record improves to 22-1 (12-1 in Big Ten).  This is Michigan’s best 23-game record in program history.  Michigan is all alone in 1^st place in the Big Ten.

What Happened?

Michigan has been in 1^st place in the Big Ten for the whole season, but they’ve been tied with a few other teams.  When they beat (#7) Michigan State on 01/30/2026, they handed MSU their 2^nd loss in Big Ten play, knocking them out of 1^st place.  When MSU beat (#5) Illinois in overtime on 02/07/2026, they handed Illinois their 2^nd loss in Big Ten play, knocking them out of 1^st place, and leaving Michigan all alone in 1^st place.  Michigan didn’t have the “Rivalry Hangover” that MSU did, when they lost their next game (at Minnesota) after losing to Michigan.  Instead, Michigan won both games this week convincingly.

Game Flow

The PSU game was another of those “get ahead early and crush the life out of the opponent” games that Michigan has enjoyed this season.  It was great to see another dominating performance, since Michigan has been winning by “only” 10-12 points lately, ever since the 30-point win over USC on 01/02/2026.  In this one, PSU led exactly once, 2-0, before Michigan overwhelmed them.  Michigan went on a sharp 15-0 run to make the score 15-2 at the 12:41 mark.  Yes, PSU only scored 2 points in the first 7:19 of the game.  Michigan kept building on their lead, pushing it up past 20 points (35-14) with 6:13 to go, and over 30 points (53-22) at the 1:04 mark.  They led by 32 points (56-24) at halftime.

The 2^nd half was more of the same.  Michigan never let the lead go below 30 points, and pushed it over 40 points (73-32) at the 15:27 mark.  At this point, the game was over.  Michigan kept the lead in the 39-41 point range for the rest of the game, getting it as high as 46, and coasting to a 41-point victory.  It really helped that PSU missed their first 14 3-point attempts.  They finally hit a 3-pointer with 7:22 left in game, finishing at 2/20.

Michigan never trailed in the OSU game, although it took a while for them to pull away.  Michigan led 2-0, OSU tied it 2-2, and Michigan went ahead for good 4-2 at the 18:51 mark.  Michigan kept the lead in the 4-6 point range for the next few minutes, although OSU crept within 2-3 point a couple times.  The turning point was the 6:38 mark: Michigan was only up by 2 points (26-24), when Aday Mara made the first 3-pointer of his career!  That sparked a Michigan rally, and they pushed their lead up as high as 12 points, settling for a 10-point lead (44-34) at halftime.  Incidentally, Mara made another 3-pointer at the 4:00 mark

Michigan toyed with OSU for the entire 2^nd half.  They kept the lead above 10 the rest of the way, mostly in the 12-14 point range for the first 13 minutes of the half.  They were up by 12 points (64-52) with 6:57 to go, when they surged ahead.  They pushed their lead up to 20 points (72-52) at the 4:14 mark, then ran the clock out to win by 21 points.

By the way: remember the loudmouth OSU reserve guard (Colin White) who predicted an OSU victory for the first game, in Crisler?  Well, he didn’t even get in this game.

Stats

The stats for the Penn State game were fabulous.  Michigan shot very well overall (40/66 = 60.6%), they shot 3-pointers very well (15/29 = 51.7%), and they shot free throws very well (15/17 = 88.2%).  They absolutely crushed PSU on the boards (44-21), but they lost the turnover battle (9-5).  They won this game with great shooting, great rebounding, and ferocious defense.  An interesting side note: Michigan out-rebounded PSU 24-4 in the first half.

The stats for the Ohio State game were good, but not as good as the PSU game.  Michigan shot well overall (33/72 = 45.8%), they shot 3-pointers well (10/24 = 41.7%), and they shot free throws very well (6/7 = 85.7%).  They dominated OSU on the boards (44-31), and they even won the turnover battle (8-12).  They won this game with solid shooting and rebounding.

Who Started?

The starters for both games were Nimari Burnett, Elliot Cadeau, Morez Johnson Jr., Yaxel Lendeborg, and Aday Mara.

Who Looked Good?

Burnett was the star of the PSU game, with a career-high 31 points.  He was “in the zone”, shooting 11/16 overall, 7/10 from deep.  When he wasn’t making a 3-pointer, he was dunking on PSU.  He was amazing!  He had a decent game vs. OSU, with 8 points, but the big story was his explosion against PSU.

Mara thought “it’s my turn for a career game” in the OSU game, so he did it.  He scored a career-high 24 points, including those two 3-pointers mentioned above.  He shot 11/16 overall, 2/3 from deep.  He also hit double figures (11 points) vs. PSU.

Trey McKenney is proving more and more valuable every week.  He’s a strong candidate for the Big Ten “6^th Man” award.  He had 12 points in each game, and he played excellent defense when he was in there.

Johnson hit double figures in both games (12 and 11 points), and he had 8 and 12 rebounds, giving him a double-double vs. OSU.

Lendeborg had one good game (14 points vs. OSU) and one decent game (6 points vs. PSU).  He contributed in other ways, such as 7 rebounds and 8 assists vs. PSU, and 14 rebounds vs. OSU, for another solid double-double.

L.J. Cason had a good week, with 12 and 8 points off the bench.

Cadeau didn’t have a very good week with scoring (7 and 2 points), but he did have 8 and 6 assists.  With all the other scoring threats around him, Michigan doesn’t need him to score a lot every game, he can contribute by running the offense.

Will Tschetter chipped in 9 and 3 points off the bench.

Who Looked Not-So-Good?

Roddy Gayle Jr. had a tough week.  He was ill and didn’t play vs. PSU, and he went scoreless (0/6) vs. his old team, OSU.  This may be the last time he gets to play against OSU, and you could tell that he wanted to have a big game in Columbus, but it didn’t happen.  Sigh.

Who Else Played?

Oscar Goodman got to play the most minutes of his career (10+) in the PSU blowout, and he took full advantage of it, scoring a career-high 6 points on 3/6 shooting.

Malick Kordel got to play 7 minutes in the PSU blowout, and he made 2 of 3 dunk attempts for 4 points.

Howard Eisley Jr. got in for the last minute of the PSU blowout, but never touched the ball.

Who Didn’t Play?

The scholarship player who didn’t play was Winters Grady.  Apparently, he has a serious foot injury, and he’s probably out for the rest of the season, with a slim chance he might be back in mid-March.

The Scout Team players who didn’t play were: Harrison Hochberg and Charlie May.

What Does It Mean?

These were two very important wins.  They kept Michigan in 1^st place in the Big Ten, they kept Michigan as the #2 team in the AP Poll, and they kept Michigan in line for a #1 seed in the NCAA Tournament.  At this point in the season, every win is crucial, and Michigan is humming along.

This Week

This week, Michigan plays 2 games.  On Wednesday (02/11/2026, 8:30 p.m. EST, BTN), they play at Northwestern, then on Saturday (02/14/2026, 12:45 p.m., CBS), they play UCLA in Crisler Arena.

Northwestern is currently 10-14 (2-11 in Big Ten), with an impressive win at USC, and unimpressive losses to Virginia, Oklahoma State, Butler, Minnesota, Rutgers, and Iowa.  They don’t have any noteworthy players, but they do have some height: a 6’11” player and a 7-footer.  This is a game that Michigan should win handily, but it can be tricky on the road in the Big Ten.  Michigan needs to keep playing their “A” game.

UCLA is currently 17-7 (9-4 in Big Ten), with an impressive win over (#4) Purdue, and unimpressive losses to California, Iowa, Wisconsin, Ohio State, and Indiana.  They don’t have any noteworthy players, and they have some height: a 6’10” player and a 6’11” player.  This could be a challenging game for Michigan.  UCLA is a middle-of-the-pack Big Ten team this season, but they are still very dangerous.

Check back next week to find out what happened and why.

Go Blue!

The (#3) University of Michigan men’s basketball team played two games this past week, and they won both of them.  On Tuesday (01/27/2026), they beat (#5) Nebraska 75-72 in Crisler Arena, then on Friday (01/30/2026), they won at (#7) Michigan State 83-71.  Michigan’s record improves to 20-1 (10-1 in Big Ten).

What Happened?

The Gauntlet: two games in four days against two Top-10 teams.  Undefeated Nebraska (20-0 coming into the game), ranked #5 in the AP Poll.  Michigan State (19-2 coming into the game), ranked #7 in the AP Poll.  Could Michigan beat both these teams in such a short time period, especially when the MSU game was in Breslin, where Michigan hasn’t won since 2018?  The answer is a resounding “YES”.  Both games felt like Sweet 16/Final Four games, and Michigan had to come from behind in both games, but they did it.  They passed the tests.  They ran the gauntlet.

Game Flow

The Nebraska game was nerve-wracking.  Nebraska led for almost the entire game, never by too much, but enough to be worrisome.  Fortunately, Michigan came from behind and won the game in crunch time.  Nebraska led 2-0 and 2-1, before Michigan got their only lead (3-2 at the 18:38 mark) until late in game.  Nebraska pulled ahead again, but not very far, and Michigan tied the game up (10-10) with 14:08 to go in the half.  Nebraska pulled away again, this time by up to 11 points (31-20 at the 10:19 mark).  They kept the lead in the 6-8 point range for a while, but Michigan got within 2 points (44-42) with 2:59 left in the half.  Nebraska pushed their lead back to 8 points, but Michigan trimmed it back to 2 points at halftime, 50-48.

I need to pause here for some context:

• Last season, Michigan beat Nebraska in Lincoln 49-46.  It was one of the ugliest wins in recent Michigan basketball history.  It was also less points than Michigan and Nebraska scored in the first half of this season’s game.
• Michigan is not used to playing from behind.  In most of their games this season, Michigan has led for the entire game, often by 20-30 points for most of the game.  Even in the close games, Michigan has usually been ahead for most of the game, just not very far ahead.
• Michigan is not used to being behind at halftime, even just 2 points down.

On to the 2^nd half:  Michigan stayed close for the first 6 minutes of the 2^nd half, although they never tied it up or went ahead.  They were still within 2 points (54-52) at the 14:09 mark, when Nebraska started to pull away.  They got their lead up to 9 points (63-54) with 11:25 to go, and kept it in the 6-8 point range for a while.  They were still up 6 points (66-60) at the 7:37 mark, when Michigan finally made their move.  They got within 2 points again (66-64) with 7:12 to go, then tied it up (72-72) with 2:16 left.  Look at the final score (75-72); Michigan held Nebraska scoreless the rest of the game, to win by 3 points.  It was very exciting.

The MSU game was very different from the Nebraska game.  Michigan went out in front early (2-0), MSU tied it up (2-2), then Michigan went ahead for the next 30 minutes.  They were up 10-2 at the 15:01 mark, before MSU finally scored again.  Yes, MSU only scored 2 points in the first 5:23.  Michigan kept the pressure on, and stretched their lead to 20-7 with 8:52 to go.  Yes, MSU only scored 7 points in the first 11:20.  State finally started scoring, and the game settled down a little.  Michigan kept the lead in the 8-10 point range for a while, until a key moment in the 1^st half: Michigan was up 8 points (29-21) at the 2:53 mark.  They missed a corner 3-pointer, and Yaxel Lendeborg was called for a foul on the scramble for the rebound.  The refs missed a clear hook-and-hold (a Flagrant 1 foul) on the MSU player battling for the rebound, so Coach May used his Head Coach’s Challenge to get them to look at it again.  When they did, they saw the flagrant foul on MSU, reversed the foul on Lendeborg, and gave him 2 free throws (which he made) and gave Michigan the ball.  On the inbounds play, Lendeborg got the inbounds pass, made a layup through contact, and drew the “and one” foul.  He made that free throw as well, for a personal 5-point play.  That made the score 34-21 at the 2:28 mark, and that opened the floodgates.  Michigan pushed the lead up to 18 points (40-22) with 47 seconds left, settling for a 16-point lead (42-26) at halftime.

Hey, a 16-point lead at halftime on the road is great, right?  Michigan has been strong in the first 4 minutes of the 2^nd half all season, right?  Well, someone forgot to tell MSU.  They came out blazing to start the 2^nd half, and they quickly cut Michigan’s lead down to 10 points (42-32) at the 18:12 mark, then 3 points (48-45) with 13:11 to go.  Michigan kept the lead in the 2-4 point range for a bit, but MSU finally tied the game (55-55) at the 7:57 mark, and went ahead (57-55) with 7:27 to go.  Michigan tied it up again (57-57), but MSU went back on top for the last time (59-57) at the 6:55 mark.  A Michigan 3-pointer with 6:39 left put Michigan back on top for good, 60-59.  State hung around for a couple minutes, but another Michigan 3-pointer at the 3:08 mark pushed the lead up to 6 points (69-63), and that was the game.  Michigan pushed the lead as high as 14 points, winning by 12.  It was a glorious victory.

Stats

The stats for the Nebraska game were decent.  Michigan shot pretty well overall (25/53 = 47.2%), they didn’t shoot 3-pointers very well (6/26 = 23.1%), and they shot free throws very well (19/23 = 82.6%).  They won the rebounding battle handily (35-23), but lost the turnover battle badly (19-11).  They won this game with free throws and rebounding, but almost lost it with all those turnovers.

The stats for the Michigan State game were mediocre.  Michigan didn’t shoot very well overall (26/59 = 44.1%), they shot 3-pointers pretty well (8/21 = 38.1%), and they shot free throws very well (23/26 = 88.5%).  The rebounding battle was a tie (36-36), and Michigan barely won the turnover battle (13-14).  Michigan won this game with good 3-point shooting and tough defense.

Who Started?

The starters for both games were Nimari Burnett, Elliot Cadeau, Morez Johnson Jr., Yaxel Lendeborg, and Aday Mara.

Who Looked Good?

Lendeborg had a very good week, with 10 and 26 points.  His 26 points were the team-high for Michigan in the MSU game.  He also had 12 rebounds vs. MSU, for an impressive double-double.  The only downside for him this week: 3-point shooting.  He was 0/6 vs. Nebraska, and 1/4 vs. MSU.

Johnson also had a good week, with 17 and 12 points.  His 17 points were the team-high for Michigan in the Nebraska game.  He also had 12 rebounds vs. Nebraska, for an impressive double-double.

Trey McKenney was the only other player to hit double figures in both games this week, with 11 and 10 points, off the bench.  He has become a very valuable 6^th man for Michigan.

Mara almost had double figures in both games, with 10 and 8 points.  He did a nice job at rim protection.

Cadeau had one decent game (7 points vs. Nebraska) and one very good game (17 points vs. MSU).  He also had 7 and 6 assists.

Will Tschetter had a very productive week off the bench, with 7 and 5 points.  He hit a big 3-pointer in each game.

Who Looked Not-So-Good?

Burnett had a quiet week, with 9 points vs. Nebraska, but 0 points vs. MSU.  He was 0/1 in 12:30 of “action” vs. MSU.  Michigan needs a lot more from him.

Roddy Gayle Jr. also had a quiet week off the bench, with 2 points in each game.

L.J. Cason also had a quiet week off the bench, with 2 and 3 points.

Who Else Played?

No one else played.

Who Didn’t Play?

The scholarship players who didn’t play were: Oscar Goodman, Winters Grady, and Malick Kordel.

The Scout Team players who didn’t play were: Howard Eisley Jr., Harrison Hochberg and Charlie May.

What Does It Mean?

These were two very important wins, especially in the race for the Big Ten regular season championship.  Michigan is now in 1^st place, tied with Illinois at 10-1.  All the other teams have at least 2 losses in Big Ten play.  Since Michigan still plays Illinois in a couple weeks, they control their own destiny.  There are still a lot of games left to play, and Michigan has several significant challenges ahead: at Ohio State, home vs. UCLA, at Purdue, Duke (neutral court), at Illinois, at Iowa, and home vs. MSU.

The other reason these were important games is that it showed the Michigan team that they can overcome adversity against top-level competition.  They were behind for most of the Nebraska game, and came back to win in crunch time.  They lost a good-sized lead (16 points) vs. MSU, and came from behind to win that game in a hostile arena.  Those are important lessons.

This Week

This week, Michigan plays 2 games.  On Thursday (02/05/2026, 6:30 p.m., FS1), they play Penn State in Crisler Arena, then on Sunday (02/08/2026, 1:00 p.m., CBS), they play at Ohio State.  It’s “Replay Week”, since Michigan has already played (and beaten) both of these teams this season.  Each Big Ten team plays 14 teams once and 3 teams twice.  The 3 teams that Michigan plays twice this season are the 3 “State” teams: Michigan State, Ohio State, and Penn State.

Penn State is currently 9-12 (0-10 in Big Ten), with 6 more sad losses since Michigan beat them in Happy Valley on 01/06/2026.  This is the ultimate “trap” game: they’re 0-10, Michigan beat them on the road, and the game is in Crisler.  Looks like an easy win, right?  That’s what we thought in 2019, when (#6) Michigan lost to an 0-11 PSU team.  On paper, Michigan should handle them easily, but the game is played on the court, not on paper.

Ohio State is currently 14-7 (6-5 in Big Ten), with a win and a loss since Michigan beat them 2 weeks ago.  You can bet that they weren’t happy losing to Michigan in Ann Arbor, and it’s going to be a lot more challenging to beat them in Columbus.  Once again, on paper, Michigan should be able to get by them, but it’s going to take a solid performance.

Check back next week to find out what happened and why.

Go Blue!

The (#3) University of Michigan men’s basketball team played two games this past week, and they won both of them.  On Tuesday (01/20/2026), they beat Indiana 86-72, then on Friday (01/23/2026), they beat Ohio State 74-62.  Both games were in Crisler Arena.  Michigan’s record improves to 18-1 (8-1 in Big Ten).

What Happened?

On the surface, these two wins look pretty similar: victories over two middle-of-the-pack Big Ten teams by similar margins (14 and 12 points).  But, looks can be deceiving: in the Indiana game, Michigan led wire-to-wire, and could have won by 25 points if they had needed to, trading points for time off the clock at the end to get the game over with.  On the other hand, OSU led for much of the game, with Michigan coming back in the last 8:00 to tie the game and go ahead for good, winning going away.  The IU game should have been a 25-point win, and the OSU game should have been an 8-point win.

Still, these are two important wins against quality opponents, regardless of the game flow.

As a side note, I’d like to thank OSU reserve guard Colin White for his fine “bulletin board” material before the game: “We hate Michigan, so we’re coming out for blood. We’re going up there to win — and we’re going to have fun doing it.”  It certainly got the crowd fired up; they gave White the reception he deserved.  Then, he backed it up with a big 2 points on 1/2 shooting.  Nice job, Colin!

Game Flow

As I mentioned above, Michigan led IU for the entire game.  Michigan started the game playing ferocious defense, and they were up 9-0 at the 14:43 mark.  A few seconds later, with 14:29 left, IU finally scored.  Yes, they went the first 5:31 of the game without a point.  In that time, they went 0/6 from 3-point range, 0/2 from 2-point range, and committed 2 turnovers.  Nice start.  Michigan got the lead up to 10 points (14-4) at the 12:45 mark, and as high as 17 points (22-5) with 9:55 left.  They let IU creep back within 8 points (31-23) at the 5:12 mark, but pushed the back up to 11 points (40-29) at halftime.

The 2^nd half was more of the same.  Michigan finally got the lead up to 20 points (57-37) at the 14:19 mark, and 25 points (66-41) with 10:45 left.  At this point, the game was over.  Michigan kept the lead in the 19-21 point range for the next few minutes, then in the 15-17 point range for the rest of the game, winning by 14 points.

The OSU game started with a bang.  Michigan won the tip, and 2 quick passes led to a thunderous dunk for a 2-0 lead just 7 seconds in.  It really got the crowd going.  The early going was a seesaw battle, with the lead going back and forth.  The game was tied (14-14) at the 11:03 mark, when OSU hit back-to-back 3-pointers to go up by 6 points (20-14).  They led for the next 7 minutes, but never by more than 6 points.  Michigan finally tied it up again (26-26) at the 3:47 mark, and managed to squeak out a 3-point lead at halftime, 33-30.

That 3-point halftime lead didn’t last long.  OSU tied it up (34-34) at the 18:56 mark, then hit back-to-back 3-pointers again, to go up 40-34 with 17:40 left.  Once again, Michigan crept back, and tied it up (40-40) at the 16:09 mark.  The lead went back and forth again, with OSU up 48-47 with 10:45 to go.  That was their last lead.  Michigan tied it up 48-48, then went ahead 50-48.  OSU tied it up one last time (50-50) at the 8:50 mark, and that’s when Michigan finally got going.  They went ahead, and pushed their lead up to 15 points (71-56) at the 3:17 mark, coasting to a 12-point win.

Stats

The stats for the Indiana game were pretty good.  Michigan shot well overall (27/53 = 50.9%), they shot 3-pointers well (10/25 = 40.0%), but they didn’t shoot free throws very well (22/33 = 66.7%).  They won the rebounding battle decisively (41-25), but they lost the turnover battle (13-10).  They won this game with good shooting and great rebounding.

The stats for the Ohio State game were just OK.  Michigan shot well overall (27/52 = 51.9%), they shot 3-pointers poorly (5/23 = 21.7%), and they shot free throws poorly (15/25 = 60.0%).  They won the rebounding battle (36-27), but they lost the turnover battle (14-13).  They won this game with good overall shooting and good rebounding.  They almost lost it with too many turnovers and poor free throw shooting.

Who Started?

The starters for both games were Nimari Burnett, Elliot Cadeau, Morez Johnson Jr., Yaxel Lendeborg, and Aday Mara.

Who Looked Good?

Lendeborg was the most consistent player this week, with 15 and 18 points.  He also had 7 and 9 rebounds, and 4 assists in each game.

Mara also had a good week, with 13 and 11 points.  He also had 3 and 4 blocked shots.

Johnson had one pretty good game (9 points vs. IU) and one good game (12 points vs. OSU).

Cadeau had one very good game (19 points vs. IU, team high) and one decent game (6 points vs. OSU).  Even though he only had 6 points in the OSU game, they were very important points: back-to-back 3-pointers during Michigan’s big run to close out the game.

Burnett had one decent game (9 points vs. IU) and one mediocre game (4 points vs. OSU).

Trey McKenney did a great job off the bench, with double figures in both games: 10 and 12 points.  He isn’t playing like a freshman, he’s playing like a seasoned veteran.  He’s in there as much for his defense as his offense.

Roddy Gayle Jr. chipped in 2 and 5 points off the bench.

Will Tschetter chipped in 7 and 0 points off the bench.

L.J. Cason chipped in 2 and 6 points off the bench.

Who Looked Not-So-Good?

All the mainstream players looked good this week.

Who Else Played?

No one else played.

Who Didn’t Play?

The scholarship players who didn’t play were: Oscar Goodman, Winters Grady, and Malick Kordel.

The Scout Team players who didn’t play were: Howard Eisley Jr., Harrison Hochberg and Charlie May.

What Does It Mean?

These were two more important wins for Michigan.  They keep Michigan in the title hunt, and they help Michigan hold onto their #3 ranking in the AP Poll.  They also help Michigan’s confidence heading into the most crucial week of the regular season.

This Week

This week, Michigan plays two huge games.  On Tuesday (01/27/2026, 7:00 p.m., Peacock), they play (#7) Nebraska in Crisler Arena, then on Friday (01/30/2026, 8:00 p.m., FOX), they play at (#10) Michigan State.

Nebraska is currently 20-0 (9-0 in Big Ten), with impressive wins over Oklahoma, (#13) Illinois, and (#9) Michigan State, and no losses.  They are one of only three teams left that are undefeated.  They have been the biggest surprise so far this season.  They haven’t been tested very much, but they have passed all their tests so far.  They have a couple noteworthy players (Pryce Sandfort and Rienk Mast), and they have plenty of height: two 6’10” players (one of them is Mast), a 6’11” player, and a 7’2” player.  This will easily be Michigan’s most challenging game to date.  Nebraska is very good, much better than any preseason predictions, and they’re on a roll.  They’re going to be trying to hang onto 1^st place in the Big Ten and their Top 10 AP ranking.  This is probably their best team ever, and they’re trying to make history.  Can Michigan beat them?  Sure, but they need to play like they did in Las Vegas for the Players Era Festival.  The way they played since the USC game in early January won’t cut vs. Nebraska.

Michigan State is currently 18-2 (8-1 in Big Ten), with impressive wins over Kentucky and North Carolina, and understandable losses to (#4) Duke and (#13) Nebraska.  MSU has only played against two ranked opponents, and they lost both games.  They have several noteworthy players (Jaxon Kohler, Jeremy Fears Jr., Carson Cooper, and Coen Carr), and they have some height: one 6’10” player (Kohler) and two 6’11” players (one is Cooper).  This game is just as challenging, and just as important, as the Nebraska game.  Can Michigan beat them in Breslin?  Yes, but it’s going to take a nearly flawless performance.

Check back next week to find out what happened and why.

Go Blue!

The (#4) University of Michigan men’s basketball team played two games this past week, and they won both of them.  On Wednesday (01/14/2026), they won at Washington 82-72, then on Saturday (01/17/2026), they won at Oregon 81-71.  Michigan’s record improves to 16-1 (6-1 in Big Ten).

What Happened?

Michigan went out to the Pacific Northwest and won two games in solid fashion.  They didn’t blow either opponent away, the way they had been doing for the first part of the season, but they won convincingly.  It’s not easy winning on the road in the Big Ten, and it’s even harder when you fly across three time zones.  These were both solid, impressive wins.

During their “Reign Of Terror” portion of the season, Michigan was winning every game with the same formula: get an early (10-point) lead, push it up to 20+ points by halftime, use a very strong start to the 2^nd half to push the lead up into the 30s, then coast to a 30-40 point win.  Since the USC game on 01/02/2026, Michigan hasn’t done that.  They won their next game, at Penn State, by 2 points, then lost at home to Wisconsin by 3 points.  They won the two games out West by 10 points each, but they never really pulled away in either game.

Game Flow

Washington scored the first 3 points of the game, and they were up 3-0 at the 19:30 mark.  That was it for them: Michigan went on a 12-0 run to make it 12-3 with 13:13 left.  Michigan kept the lead in the 8-10 point range for a while, up by 12 points (30-18) at the 4:34 mark.  Washington managed to trim their deficit down to 9 points (39-30) at halftime.  The 2^nd half was more of the same: Michigan kept their lead in the 8-10 point range for the rest of the game.  Washington got as close as 6 points a few times, the last time being 69-63 at the 6:57 mark, but Michigan pulled away again, up 15 points (80-65) with 3:00 to go.  Washington cut the deficit down to 10 points by the end of the game, but that was as close as they got.

Michigan started out strong in the Oregon game, up 7-2 at the 17:38 mark.  They slowly built their lead up to 11 points (21-10) with 10:08 to go, then frittered it away for the rest of the half.  They let Oregon creep back within 2 points (23-21) at the 8:09 mark, before they pushed their lead back up to 8 points (35-27) with 5:57 to go in the half.  Oregon kept chipping away, and got back within 2 points again (35-33) at the 3:57 mark.  They finally went ahead for the first time all game (38-37) with 1:56 to go, and hit a 3-pointer with 2 seconds left in the half to keep that 1-point lead at halftime, 41-40.

Michigan isn’t used to being down at halftime, and they didn’t exactly come out hot to start the 2^nd half.  They were still down 1 point (47-46) at the 17:29 mark, but they finally got going, took the lead, and pushed it up to 9 points (58-49) at the 13:20 mark.  They kept the lead in the 8-10 point range for a while, and still led by 10 points (74-64) with 5:21 left.  Oregon got as close as 6 points a couple times, but that was it.  Michigan won by 10, 81-71.

Stats

The stats for the Washington game were just OK.  Michigan shot pretty well overall (32/69 = 46.4%), they shot 3-pointers poorly (5/23 = 21.7%), and they shot free throws well enough (13/17 = 76.5%).  They won the rebounding battle (42-40) and the turnover battle (8-12).  They won this game with decent overall shooting, solid rebounding, and low turnovers.

The stats for the Oregon game were pretty good.  Michigan shot pretty well overall (25/51 = 49.0%), they shot 3-pointers well (9/23 = 39.1%), and they shot free throws well enough (22/30 = 73.3%).  They won the rebounding battle (36-30), but lost the turnover battle (14-11).  They won this game with decent shooting and solid rebounding.

Who Started?

The starters for both games were Nimari Burnett, Elliot Cadeau, Morez Johnson Jr., Yaxel Lendeborg, and Aday Mara.

Who Looked Good?

Mara looked the best this week, with 20 and 12 points.  He had a great game shooting vs. Washington: 10/11 overall.  Wow!  He also had 3 blocked shots in each game.

Johnson had one good game (18 points vs. Washington) and one decent game (9 points vs. Oregon).  He also had a career-high 16 rebounds in the Washington game, for an impressive double-double.

Lendeborg had one good game (14 points vs. Washington) and one mediocre game (6 points vs. Oregon).  He also had 7 and 10 rebounds, which really helped.

Burnett had one good game (15 points vs. Oregon) and one decent game (7 points vs. Washington).

Cadeau had one good game (17 points vs. Oregon) and one terrible game (0 points vs. Washington).  He also had 6 and 5 assists.

Roddy Gayle Jr. had one decent game (9 points vs. Washington) and one lousy game (3 points vs. Oregon).  He also had 4 rebounds and 5 assists in the Washington game.

Will Tschetter chipped in 5 and 8 points off the bench.

L.J. Cason chipped in 6 and 7 points off the bench.

Trey McKenney chipped in 3 and 4 points off the bench.  That’s kind of low for him, since he’s averaging 10.1 points/game.

Who Looked Not-So-Good?

All the mainstream players looked good this week.

Who Else Played?

No one else played.

Who Didn’t Play?

The scholarship players who didn’t play were: Oscar Goodman, Winters Grady, and Malick Kordel.

The Scout Team players who didn’t play were: Howard Eisley Jr., Harrison Hochberg and Charlie May.

What Does It Mean?

These were two important games for Michigan to win, and they took care of business.  Washington and Oregon will probably end up finishing in the bottom half of the Big Ten race this season, but they’re good solid teams, making these two wins good solid entries on Michigan’s NCAA Tournament resume.  They also keep Michigan in the hunt for the Big Ten regular season title, just one game behind Nebraska and Purdue, both 7-0.

This Week

This week, Michigan plays two games, both in Crisler Arena.  On Tuesday (01/20/2026, 7:00 p.m., Peacock), they play Indiana, then on Friday (01/23/2026, 8:00 p.m., FOX), they play Ohio State.

Indiana is currently 12-6 (3-4 in Big Ten), with no impressive wins, and unimpressive losses to Minnesota and Iowa.  They don’t have any noteworthy players, and they only have a little height: two 6’10” players.  This is a game that Michigan should win convincingly, but only if they can get back to their non-conference form.

Ohio State is currently 12-5 (4-3 in Big Ten), with an impressive win over UCLA, and unimpressive losses to Pittsburgh and Washington.  They have one noteworthy player (Bruce Thornton), and they have some height: a 6’10” guy, a 7-footer, and a 7’2” guy.  This could be a very challenging game for Michigan, but they can win it if they stay focused.

Check back next week to find out what happened and why.

Go Blue!