WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible

Author	Message

MichFan4Life Total Posts : 12560 Reward points : 3448 Joined: 9/4/2002 Location: Tennessee Status: offline	WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible Tuesday, January 01, 2013 4:49 PM (permalink) 0 Taco isn't enough, McCray isn't enough. We need many, many more in both these classes. <message edited by MichFan4Life on Tuesday, January 01, 2013 4:51 PM>
	#1

ScottsdaleBlue Total Posts : 13219 Reward points : 3235 Joined: 6/5/2003 Location: Chicago IL USA Status: online	Re:WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible Tuesday, January 01, 2013 5:27 PM (permalink) 0 Who is our pass rusher in this class? Go Blue!! Ohio St.'s actions are not unlike their lower intestine: stinky and loaded with danger.
	#2

TK23Blue Total Posts : 4987 Reward points : 2843 Joined: 9/7/2002 Location: Huntington Beach CA USA Status: offline	Re:WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible Tuesday, January 01, 2013 5:30 PM (permalink) 0 Some playmakers would help too. Like, a receiver, a running back, and anybody that can fog a mirror in the secondary.
	#3

MichFan4Life

Total Posts : 12560
Reward points : 3448
Joined: 9/4/2002
Location: Tennessee
Status: offline

Re:WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible Tuesday, January 01, 2013 5:58 PM (permalink)

0

We got 5 DB commits in this class plus 4 in the last. We still lack a lockdown CB IMO but I less worried about the talent in the secondary long term (coaching is another story for another day).

We have 1 1/2 edge rushers in this class and only took 1 in last year's class. I'm not quite ready to throw in the towel on Frank Clark but we're heading into year 3 and there aren't even flashes of him turning into an ELITE pass rusher.

The jury is still out on Taco Charlton IMO. Even if he does work out he's one guy. South Carolina rotated 4 guys at DE today, O$U rotated 5 against us early in the year.

#4

McMurtry1 Total Posts : 1635 Reward points : 1605 Joined: 5/14/2010 Status: offline	Re:WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:17 PM (permalink) 0 WOTS is that EJ Levenberry still wants (back) in our '13 class. Perhaps Hoke & Mattison should reconsider their prior stance? <message edited by McMurtry1 on Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:18 PM>
	#5

ScottsdaleBlue Total Posts : 13219 Reward points : 3235 Joined: 6/5/2003 Location: Chicago IL USA Status: online	Re:WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:24 PM (permalink) 0 McMurtry1 WOTS is that EJ Levenberry still wants (back) in our '13 class. Perhaps Hoke & Mattison should reconsider their prior stance? Definitely...they did with Dawson. Do we have room? Go Blue!! Ohio St.'s actions are not unlike their lower intestine: stinky and loaded with danger.
	#6

McMurtry1

Total Posts : 1635
Reward points : 1605
Joined: 5/14/2010
Status: offline

Re:WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:33 PM (permalink)

0

ScottsdaleBlue

McMurtry1

WOTS is that EJ Levenberry still wants (back) in our '13 class. Perhaps Hoke & Mattison should reconsider their prior stance?

Definitely...they did with Dawson.

Do we have room?

Go Blue!!

We will definitely have the room. The issue with EJ is somewhat different than it was with Dawson, though and I'm not sure that Hoke (and, in particular, Mattison) wants to deal with it.

#7

ScottsdaleBlue

Total Posts : 13219
Reward points : 3235
Joined: 6/5/2003
Location: Chicago IL USA
Status: online

Re:WANTED: As many pass rushers as possible Wednesday, January 02, 2013 9:01 PM (permalink)

0

McMurtry1

ScottsdaleBlue

McMurtry1

WOTS is that EJ Levenberry still wants (back) in our '13 class. Perhaps Hoke & Mattison should reconsider their prior stance?

Definitely...they did with Dawson.

Do we have room?

Go Blue!!

We will definitely have the room. The issue with EJ is somewhat different than it was with Dawson, though and I'm not sure that Hoke (and, in particular, Mattison) wants to deal with it.