ScottsdaleBlue
-
Total Posts
:
13219
-
Reward points
:
3237
- Joined: 6/5/2003
- Location: Chicago IL USA
-
Status: offline
|
Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 3:22 PM
( permalink)
http://recruiting.scout.com/2/1184405.html Few teams get an early jump on recruiting like the Texas Longhorns, who usually have their class virtually completed by St. Patrick's Day, but the trend of early commitments has gone nationwide, and for the first time, a team other than Texas sits atop Scout's Team Recruiting Rankings upon its first release. Michigan has built off the momentum of a Top 5 class in 2012, and the Wolverines have their sights set on an even better finish in 2013. While there is still a long, long way to go until National Signing Day next February, its Michigan and Head Coach Brady Hoke who sit in the pole position at No. 1. Headlining Michigan's class is quarterback Shane Morris (6-foot-3/195 pounds) of Warren, Mich. who has been committed to the Wolverines for nearly a year. Morris is a big lefty who had a good showing at the Elite 11 Tryout in Columbus, Ohio recently and earned an invite to the finals held in July. Morris is bringing some friends with him including the nation's top offensive guard prospect Patrick Kugler (6-4/270) of Wexford, Pa. Kugler is a lean but powerful interior line prospect who will only get bigger and stronger as he gets older. Like last year, the Wolverines are doing a good job in the state Ohio. Of Michigan's 17 total commitments, eight of them come from the Buckeye state, including five-star safety prospect Dymonte Thomas (6-1/180) of Alliance, Ohio. 1)Michigan 2)Texas 3)Texas A&M 4)Ohio State 5)Notre Dame 6)Georgia 7)Florida 8)Alabama 9)Florida State 10)USC 11)Auburn 12)Penn State 13)Oklahoma 14)Missouri 15)LSU 16)UCLA 17)Nebraska 18)Clemson 19)Miami 20)Michigan State Go Blue!!
Ohio St.'s actions are not unlike their lower intestine: stinky and loaded with danger.
|
|
|
|
jsj_297
-
Total Posts
:
6433
-
Reward points
:
3039
- Joined: 7/28/2008
- Location: N.C.
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 4:32 PM
( permalink)
Look at lil bro down there trying to squeek in the #20 position!! hahaha
Michigan vs tsiO rivalry: 58 wins, 36 losses, 6 ties, & 9 CHEATS Hoke: 1-1 Urban 1-1 vs. UM
|
|
|
|
MichFan4Life
-
Total Posts
:
12560
-
Reward points
:
3450
- Joined: 9/4/2002
- Location: Tennessee
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 5:58 PM
( permalink)
Its still early but the B1G is off to a MUCH better recruiting year than last year's abysmal haul. 5 of the top 20 is pretty decent and needs to be maintained.
|
|
|
|
ScottsdaleBlue
-
Total Posts
:
13219
-
Reward points
:
3237
- Joined: 6/5/2003
- Location: Chicago IL USA
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 6:13 PM
( permalink)
It's not where you start but how we finish....can't go 0'fer on signing day like last year. It's all nice and good to be up at the top right now, but we will most certainly get passed up by some schools come signing day. I think we'll still have a top 5 class. Go Blue!!
Ohio St.'s actions are not unlike their lower intestine: stinky and loaded with danger.
|
|
|
|
MaizeRage6320
-
Total Posts
:
1493
-
Reward points
:
2288
- Joined: 9/1/2007
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 6:34 PM
( permalink)
It's the Jimmies and Joes, not the Xs and Os. At this point we're a top five lock, and we've got a legitimate shot at remaining in the top two.
University of Michigan '13. Maize and blue to the grave.
|
|
|
|
McMurtry1
-
Total Posts
:
1636
-
Reward points
:
1605
- Joined: 5/14/2010
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 8:07 PM
( permalink)
ScottsdaleBlue It's not where you start but how we finish....can't go 0'fer on signing day like last year. It's all nice and good to be up at the top right now, but we will most certainly get passed up by some schools come signing day. I think we'll still have a top 5 class. Go Blue!! Well, none of that matters, actually. Results can't truly be judged for another three or four years. Texas routinely lands top 3 classes and yet the last two years they have finished the regular season with 5-7 & 6-6 records. According to the recruiting rankings on signing day, that should've never happened, but, it did.
|
|
|
|
wolverinefan07
-
Total Posts
:
1117
-
Reward points
:
1279
- Joined: 7/21/2011
- Location: Glendale, California
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 8:29 PM
( permalink)
AWESOME news...for now! Let's see how we finish & how the class performs, on the field!
"No man is more important than the team, no coach is more important than the team...the Team, the Team, the Team!"
|
|
|
|
ScottsdaleBlue
-
Total Posts
:
13219
-
Reward points
:
3237
- Joined: 6/5/2003
- Location: Chicago IL USA
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 9:47 PM
( permalink)
Reading more about our 2013 OL class...I'm really liking it. They could be a nasty group together. We just need a center to quarterback them. Go Blue!!
Ohio St.'s actions are not unlike their lower intestine: stinky and loaded with danger.
|
|
|
|
ScottsdaleBlue
-
Total Posts
:
13219
-
Reward points
:
3237
- Joined: 6/5/2003
- Location: Chicago IL USA
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 10:02 PM
( permalink)
McMurtry1 ScottsdaleBlue It's not where you start but how we finish....can't go 0'fer on signing day like last year. It's all nice and good to be up at the top right now, but we will most certainly get passed up by some schools come signing day. I think we'll still have a top 5 class. Go Blue!! Well, none of that matters, actually. Results can't truly be judged for another three or four years. Texas routinely lands top 3 classes and yet the last two years they have finished the regular season with 5-7 & 6-6 records. According to the recruiting rankings on signing day, that should've never happened, but, it did. And Alabama has had top 2 classes the last 4yrs and has won 2 NC's. Just sayin... Go Blue!!
Ohio St.'s actions are not unlike their lower intestine: stinky and loaded with danger.
|
|
|
|
UMWolverine5
-
Total Posts
:
1603
-
Reward points
:
2874
- Joined: 9/24/2005
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, May 07, 2012 10:15 PM
( permalink)
ScottsdaleBlue Reading more about our 2013 OL class...I'm really liking it. They could be a nasty group together. We just need a center to quarterback them. Go Blue!! Despite being rated as an OG, I believe Kugler was targeted (and really wants to) play center.
"Character wins in life and character wins on the football field." — Michigan coach Brady Hoke. Creator of The Boys of Fall Blog: Preaching the truth about college football. Visit at: http://theboysoffallblog.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
MichFan4Life
-
Total Posts
:
12560
-
Reward points
:
3450
- Joined: 9/4/2002
- Location: Tennessee
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Tuesday, May 08, 2012 7:10 AM
( permalink)
McMurtry1 ScottsdaleBlue It's not where you start but how we finish....can't go 0'fer on signing day like last year. It's all nice and good to be up at the top right now, but we will most certainly get passed up by some schools come signing day. I think we'll still have a top 5 class. Go Blue!! Well, none of that matters, actually. Results can't truly be judged for another three or four years. Texas routinely lands top 3 classes and yet the last two years they have finished the regular season with 5-7 & 6-6 records. According to the recruiting rankings on signing day, that should've never happened, but, it did. There are more factors involved down in Texas than just talent. A lack of talent isn't why they've gone 5-7 and 6-6.
|
|
|
|
McMurtry1
-
Total Posts
:
1636
-
Reward points
:
1605
- Joined: 5/14/2010
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Tuesday, May 08, 2012 10:45 AM
( permalink)
MichFan4Life McMurtry1 ScottsdaleBlue It's not where you start but how we finish....can't go 0'fer on signing day like last year. It's all nice and good to be up at the top right now, but we will most certainly get passed up by some schools come signing day. I think we'll still have a top 5 class. Go Blue!! Well, none of that matters, actually. Results can't truly be judged for another three or four years. Texas routinely lands top 3 classes and yet the last two years they have finished the regular season with 5-7 & 6-6 records. According to the recruiting rankings on signing day, that should've never happened, but, it did. There are more factors involved down in Texas than just talent. A lack of talent isn't why they've gone 5-7 and 6-6. It's about 90% of the problem. Their o-lines have been brutal the last couple of years.
|
|
|
|
TK23Blue
-
Total Posts
:
4987
-
Reward points
:
2843
- Joined: 9/7/2002
- Location: Huntington Beach CA USA
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:16 AM
( permalink)
McMurtry1 ScottsdaleBlue It's not where you start but how we finish....can't go 0'fer on signing day like last year. It's all nice and good to be up at the top right now, but we will most certainly get passed up by some schools come signing day. I think we'll still have a top 5 class. Go Blue!! Well, none of that matters, actually. Results can't truly be judged for another three or four years. Texas routinely lands top 3 classes and yet the last two years they have finished the regular season with 5-7 & 6-6 records. According to the recruiting rankings on signing day, that should've never happened, but, it did. It does matter. There's a consistent correlation between NC teams and recruiting rankings. Not always, but it's the majority. But if it doesn't matter why do we care if Michigan is ranked 2, 5, or 25? The fact that we have an entire forum section dedicated to recruiting tells me a lot of people consider it important. It's a fact-consistently finish high in the recruiting rankings and you'll win a lot more games than you lose. USC, Florida, OSU, LSU, Alabama etc etc haven't been winning like they have because they've finished 20th in recruiting .
|
|
|
|
MaizeRage6320
-
Total Posts
:
1493
-
Reward points
:
2288
- Joined: 9/1/2007
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Tuesday, May 08, 2012 12:12 PM
( permalink)
McMurtry1 MichFan4Life McMurtry1 ScottsdaleBlue It's not where you start but how we finish....can't go 0'fer on signing day like last year. It's all nice and good to be up at the top right now, but we will most certainly get passed up by some schools come signing day. I think we'll still have a top 5 class. Go Blue!! Well, none of that matters, actually. Results can't truly be judged for another three or four years. Texas routinely lands top 3 classes and yet the last two years they have finished the regular season with 5-7 & 6-6 records. According to the recruiting rankings on signing day, that should've never happened, but, it did. There are more factors involved down in Texas than just talent. A lack of talent isn't why they've gone 5-7 and 6-6. It's about 90% of the problem. Their o-lines have been brutal the last couple of years. 90% of the problem? I haven't looked into their recruiting classes much but I find that very hard to accept. I'd imagine it has more to do with the assistants' ability to coach and the level of competition, because the Big 12 has been very strong these last few years. Texas not having talent is unheard of.
University of Michigan '13. Maize and blue to the grave.
|
|
|
|
MichFan4Life
-
Total Posts
:
12560
-
Reward points
:
3450
- Joined: 9/4/2002
- Location: Tennessee
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Tuesday, May 08, 2012 1:21 PM
( permalink)
McMurtry1 MichFan4Life McMurtry1 ScottsdaleBlue It's not where you start but how we finish....can't go 0'fer on signing day like last year. It's all nice and good to be up at the top right now, but we will most certainly get passed up by some schools come signing day. I think we'll still have a top 5 class. Go Blue!! Well, none of that matters, actually. Results can't truly be judged for another three or four years. Texas routinely lands top 3 classes and yet the last two years they have finished the regular season with 5-7 & 6-6 records. According to the recruiting rankings on signing day, that should've never happened, but, it did. There are more factors involved down in Texas than just talent. A lack of talent isn't why they've gone 5-7 and 6-6. It's about 90% of the problem. Their o-lines have been brutal the last couple of years. Rebuilding from losing McCoy and a ton of others off a championship team has been a lot of it (Florida has gone through the same), plus there has been poor QB play, and a lot of coaching turnover. As guys mature the cream will climb right back to the top.
|
|
|
|
jthorp24
-
Total Posts
:
2905
-
Reward points
:
3080
- Joined: 12/29/2008
- Location: Saginaw, MI
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Tuesday, May 08, 2012 1:41 PM
( permalink)
jsj_297 Look at lil bro down there trying to squeek in the #20 position!! hahaha They are rated much higher right now then they will finish...
|
|
|
|
mazebacker70
-
Total Posts
:
899
-
Reward points
:
1988
- Joined: 9/12/2007
- Location: The Spirit of God
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:59 AM
( permalink)
No matter how it plays out. I really like this class for what they bring to Michigan. I could care less where they are or are not ranked. It's does a class fill needs for a school. This class does that.
John 16:33
|
|
|
|
WarrenWolverine
-
Total Posts
:
2779
-
Reward points
:
3327
- Joined: 6/11/2006
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:15 AM
( permalink)
UMWolverine5 ScottsdaleBlue Reading more about our 2013 OL class...I'm really liking it. They could be a nasty group together. We just need a center to quarterback them. Go Blue!! Despite being rated as an OG, I believe Kugler was targeted (and really wants to) play center. Yes, he will be a center. Hoke recruited as a center. I hate to give such expectations, but I think he'll be a damn good one. Maybe even have ourselves another Rimmington winner.
|
|
|
|
UMWolverine5
-
Total Posts
:
1603
-
Reward points
:
2874
- Joined: 9/24/2005
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:44 AM
( permalink)
WarrenWolverine UMWolverine5 ScottsdaleBlue Reading more about our 2013 OL class...I'm really liking it. They could be a nasty group together. We just need a center to quarterback them. Go Blue!! Despite being rated as an OG, I believe Kugler was targeted (and really wants to) play center. Yes, he will be a center. Hoke recruited as a center. I hate to give such expectations, but I think he'll be a damn good one. Maybe even have ourselves another Rimmington winner. With his family tree, talent level, and work ethic, expectations are bound to be high.
"Character wins in life and character wins on the football field." — Michigan coach Brady Hoke. Creator of The Boys of Fall Blog: Preaching the truth about college football. Visit at: http://theboysoffallblog.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
ScottsdaleBlue
-
Total Posts
:
13219
-
Reward points
:
3237
- Joined: 6/5/2003
- Location: Chicago IL USA
-
Status: offline
|
Re:Scout Team Rankings
Monday, December 31, 2012 12:02 PM
( permalink)
Michigan still ranking #1 by Scout. 1. Michigan 2. Texas A&M 3. Georgia 4. ND 5. O$U 6. Florida 7. U$C 8. Bama 9. L$U 10. UCLA Go Blue!!
Ohio St.'s actions are not unlike their lower intestine: stinky and loaded with danger.
|
|
|
|