Uniforms!!

just throwing this one out there. 
 
http://www.football-fanshop.com/Michigan-Wolverines-Authentic-Football-Jersey_-1786792952_PD.html
 
 

That's one of the photos I saw!

Phil Callihan
Editor-in-Chief
UMGoBlue.COM

if that is indeed what they look like i have no problem at all. I think those look pretty good, espcially considering how people were freaking out about them being changed

if that's the case then I think people can relax because they look pretty good.  

Maybe if they try to copy UGA's blackout, we'll do it in Navy.  Might look good.

Michigan National Championships 1901, 1902, 1903, 1904, 1918, 1923, 1932, 1933, 1947, 1948, 1997

21-15-1 ND
57-43-6 OSU
67-26-3 MSU

Those are sweet, mainly because they haven't changed much.

 

NICE!  Thanks for the post.  Those aren't bad at all.  Were Nike's retail authentics $199.99 retail price?
 
 
Check out this hooded sweatshirt they're also selling.  I like it!
 
 
 
 
http://www.football-fanshop.com/Michigan-Wolverines-Helmet-Hooded-Sweatshirt_1789135847_PD.html

 

ORIGINAL: MaizeRageWolverine

NICE!  Thanks for the post.  Those aren't bad at all.  Were Nike's retail authentics $199.99 retail price?


Check out this hooded sweatshirt they're also selling.  I like it!


 

http://www.football-fanshop.com/Michigan-Wolverines-Helmet-Hooded-Sweatshirt_1789135847_PD.html

i kinda like that..i just wish it was all blue with maize logo and lettering

I know a lot of us are saying, "Hey, we can relax.  They're not bad.  We were worried about nothing."  But that's the point to me.  They're not an improvement in anyway so why mess around with it?  (Frankly, they look like a baseball jersey.)  It's all about the dollar.  Keep tweaking them every other year so people have to go out and buy new ones.  (Which expains why I still wear the Jamie Morris #23 road jersey from the 80's.  I guess I'm too cheap to 'modernize'.)  The only thing more stupid than the M on the sleeve is the Adidas logo on the chest.

"I have marked down losses for Wisconsin, Michigan State, Penn State, and Ohio State. And then there could be others such as Illinois".-BigHouseFootball March 08

2 things.

Pretty sure that's not an M on the sleeve.  Pretty sure it's the No. 1.  Just a bad angle makes it look like an M.

Second, the logo is in the exact same place as the nike swoosh from last year.

ORIGINAL: TK23Blue

I know a lot of us are saying, "Hey, we can relax.  They're not bad.  We were worried about nothing."  But that's the point to me.  They're not an improvement in anyway so why mess around with it?  (Frankly, they look like a baseball jersey.)  It's all about the dollar.  Keep tweaking them every other year so people have to go out and buy new ones.  (Which expains why I still wear the Jamie Morris #23 road jersey from the 80's.  I guess I'm too cheap to 'modernize'.)  The only thing more stupid than the M on the sleeve is the Adidas logo on the chest.

ORIGINAL: ncd

2 things.

Pretty sure that's not an M on the sleeve.  Pretty sure it's the No. 1.  Just a bad angle makes it look like an M.

Second, the logo is in the exact same place as the nike swoosh from last year.

ORIGINAL: TK23Blue

I know a lot of us are saying, "Hey, we can relax.  They're not bad.  We were worried about nothing."  But that's the point to me.  They're not an improvement in anyway so why mess around with it?  (Frankly, they look like a baseball jersey.)  It's all about the dollar.  Keep tweaking them every other year so people have to go out and buy new ones.  (Which expains why I still wear the Jamie Morris #23 road jersey from the 80's.  I guess I'm too cheap to 'modernize'.)  The only thing more stupid than the M on the sleeve is the Adidas logo on the chest.

Good eye. So how do we know for sure they are putting block Ms on the sleeves? If those aren't Ms then the jersey is nearly exactly the same, the only difference is the little maize strip inside the collar.

ORIGINAL: ncd

2 things.

Pretty sure that's not an M on the sleeve.  Pretty sure it's the No. 1.  Just a bad angle makes it look like an M.

Second, the logo is in the exact same place as the nike swoosh from last year.

ORIGINAL: TK23Blue

I know a lot of us are saying, "Hey, we can relax.  They're not bad.  We were worried about nothing."  But that's the point to me.  They're not an improvement in anyway so why mess around with it?  (Frankly, they look like a baseball jersey.)  It's all about the dollar.  Keep tweaking them every other year so people have to go out and buy new ones.  (Which expains why I still wear the Jamie Morris #23 road jersey from the 80's.  I guess I'm too cheap to 'modernize'.)  The only thing more stupid than the M on the sleeve is the Adidas logo on the chest.

 
Ohhhh.  Ok.  My bad.  It looked like an M but you may be right.

"I have marked down losses for Wisconsin, Michigan State, Penn State, and Ohio State. And then there could be others such as Illinois".-BigHouseFootball March 08

ORIGINAL: TK23Blue
 The only thing more stupid than the M on the sleeve is the Adidas logo on the chest.

I share the same point of view.  I am sure I'll get used to it after a while, but right now I can't stand seeing an Adidas logo or those maize M's on the sleeves. 

Does everyone REALLY believe this is the new jersey?  I mean it doesn't strike you as a little odd that the first place that they roll out the new jerseys is football fanshop.com?  I still don't believe it till I see the Atheletic Dept introduce one.

Score one for Phil! 

Phil Callihan (aka philc) seems to be all over the web today for properly identifying the new jersey:

www.mgoblog.com
http://www.theonlygamethatmatters.com/2008/06/while-i-was-out.html

University of Michigan
Class of 2010
GO BLUE!

It's totally a 1 on the sleeve.

if you go to the site and click on the photo to enlarge it... you can see the detail at the top of the "1" where it has a slight slant. the M logo is, well you all know what the M logo looks like, definitely no slant.


It really could easily be confused with an M tho. So the only changes are the adidas logo (which is minimal but i still think nike looks cooler than adidas) and that little M on the back of the neck. Which well, is pointless but too small to pay attention to.

Now those I can live with, but I do agree, that vertical strip is pointless-why add it.

Second, $199!! My lord, Nike was what, 150? And they looked better than these.

"Jim Tressel's DNA is linked to the Devil at some point, I'm sure of it."
-Doug Karsch "The Big Show"

Michigan Alum
Class of 2008

8-16

I would think if it's authentic it would have the elastic sleeves too

 

It's totally a 1 on the sleeve.

After having some time to look at the pics, I think you're right.

Does everyone REALLY believe this is the new jersey?  I mean it doesn't strike you as a little odd that the first place that they roll out the new jerseys is football fanshop.com?  I still don't believe it till I see the Atheletic Dept introduce one.

The place I saw the images was a little more closely aligned with UM than fanshop.com

Phil Callihan
Editor-in-Chief
UMGoBlue.COM

A larger image...

The University of Michigan 20-5-1 vs the SEC